A systematic review of 87 peer-grading studies finds random assignment is the most common strategy and that 3-5 reviews per submission balances grading accuracy with student workload.
Insights about large-scale online peer assessment from an analysis of an astronomy MOOC,
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers
A systematic review of 87 peer-grading studies finds random assignment is the most common strategy and that 3-5 reviews per submission balances grading accuracy with student workload.