A scoping review organizes decades of NLP evaluation debates into a taxonomy of recurring concerns and trade-offs with a structured checklist for better evaluation design.
In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 479–488, Baltimore, Maryland
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Evaluation Revisited: A Taxonomy of Evaluation Concerns in Natural Language Processing
A scoping review organizes decades of NLP evaluation debates into a taxonomy of recurring concerns and trade-offs with a structured checklist for better evaluation design.