Generative LMs in laissez-faire open-ended prompting settings disproportionately generate subordinated portrayals of minoritized race, gender, and sexual orientation identities at rates hundreds to thousands of times higher than empowering ones.
Title resolution pending
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 2
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4roles
background 2polarities
background 2representative citing papers
Empirical analysis of 1,524 AI incident reports shows 83% arise from worker-AI trait misalignments, with 74% of those traceable to developers prioritizing efficiency over precision or personalization.
Generative AI boosts attackers' ability to create harmful content at scale while also enabling defenders to detect threats, support users, and improve moderation processes.
A scoping review of AIES and FAccT literature concludes that AI trustworthiness research prioritizes technical precision over social, ethical, and institutional factors, leaving the sociotechnical nature of AI systems underexplored.
citing papers explorer
-
Laissez-Faire Harms: Algorithmic Biases in Generative Language Models
Generative LMs in laissez-faire open-ended prompting settings disproportionately generate subordinated portrayals of minoritized race, gender, and sexual orientation identities at rates hundreds to thousands of times higher than empowering ones.
-
The Quiet Path from Seemingly Minor Design Errors to Workplace AI Incidents
Empirical analysis of 1,524 AI incident reports shows 83% arise from worker-AI trait misalignments, with 74% of those traceable to developers prioritizing efficiency over precision or personalization.
-
How Generative AI Empowers Attackers and Defenders Across the Trust & Safety Landscape
Generative AI boosts attackers' ability to create harmful content at scale while also enabling defenders to detect threats, support users, and improve moderation processes.
-
Understanding AI Trustworthiness: A Scoping Review of AIES & FAccT Articles
A scoping review of AIES and FAccT literature concludes that AI trustworthiness research prioritizes technical precision over social, ethical, and institutional factors, leaving the sociotechnical nature of AI systems underexplored.