Claims that GloVe and Word2Vec embeddings are equivalent to metric MDS, but an explicit definitional choice makes the equivalence circular.
Structured versus Decorated Cospans
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
One goal of applied category theory is to understand open systems. We compare two ways of describing open systems as cospans equipped with extra data. First, given a functor $L \colon \mathsf{A} \to \mathsf{X}$, a "structured cospan" is a diagram in $\mathsf{X}$ of the form $L(a) \rightarrow x \leftarrow L(b)$. If $\mathsf{A}$ and $\mathsf{X}$ have finite colimits and $L$ preserves them, it is known that there is a symmetric monoidal double category whose objects are those of $\mathsf{A}$ and whose horizontal 1-cells are structured cospans. Second, given a pseudofunctor $F \colon \mathsf{A} \to \mathbf{Cat}$, a "decorated cospan" is a diagram in $\mathsf{A}$ of the form $a \rightarrow m \leftarrow b$ together with an object of $F(m)$. Generalizing the work of Fong, we show that if $\mathsf{A}$ has finite colimits and $F \colon (\mathsf{A},+) \to (\mathsf{Cat},\times)$ is symmetric lax monoidal, there is a symmetric monoidal double category whose objects are those of $\mathsf{A}$ and whose horizontal 1-cells are decorated cospans. We prove that under certain conditions, these two constructions become isomorphic when we take $\mathsf{X} = \int F$ to be the Grothendieck category of $F$. We illustrate these ideas with applications to electrical circuits, Petri nets, dynamical systems and epidemiological modeling.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Transparent Semantic Spaces: A Categorical Approach to Explainable Word Embeddings
Claims that GloVe and Word2Vec embeddings are equivalent to metric MDS, but an explicit definitional choice makes the equivalence circular.