Using 2024 inputs and exclusive |V_cb|, the standard model predicts only about 65% of the measured |epsilon_K|, a gap that vanishes when inclusive |V_cb| is used.
Calculating the $K_L-K_S$ mass difference and $\epsilon_K$ to sub-percent accuracy
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The real and imaginary parts of the $K_L-K_S$ mixing matrix receive contributions from all three charge-2/3 quarks: up, charm and top. These give both short- and long-distance contributions which are accessible through a combination of perturbative and lattice methods. We will discuss a strategy to compute both the mass difference, $\Delta M_K$ and $\epsilon_K$ to sub-percent accuracy, looking in detail at the contributions from each of the three CKM matrix element products $V_{id}^*V_{is}$ for $i=u, c$ and $t$ as described in Ref. [1]
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
hep-lat 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
dataset 1polarities
use dataset 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
2024 Update on $\varepsilon_K$ with lattice QCD inputs
Using 2024 inputs and exclusive |V_cb|, the standard model predicts only about 65% of the measured |epsilon_K|, a gap that vanishes when inclusive |V_cb| is used.