Precomputing only a few thousand hidden vectors instead of 44 million is enough for MEMIT, ROME, and EMMET editing to match full-precomputation scores on CounterFact.
Is Bigger Edit Batch Size Always Better? -- An Empirical Study on Model Editing with Llama-3
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This study presents a targeted model editing analysis focused on the latest large language model, Llama-3. We explore the efficacy of popular model editing techniques - ROME, MEMIT, and EMMET, which are designed for precise layer interventions. We identify the most effective layers for targeted edits through an evaluation that encompasses up to 4096 edits across three distinct strategies: sequential editing, batch editing, and a hybrid approach we call as sequential-batch editing. Our findings indicate that increasing edit batch-sizes may degrade model performance more significantly than using smaller edit batches sequentially for equal number of edits. With this, we argue that sequential model editing is an important component for scaling model editing methods and future research should focus on methods that combine both batched and sequential editing. This observation suggests a potential limitation in current model editing methods which push towards bigger edit batch sizes, and we hope it paves way for future investigations into optimizing batch sizes and model editing performance.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Efficient Knowledge Editing via Minimal Precomputation
Precomputing only a few thousand hidden vectors instead of 44 million is enough for MEMIT, ROME, and EMMET editing to match full-precomputation scores on CounterFact.