Pith. sign in

Where Are We? Evaluating LLM Performance on African Languages

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Africa's rich linguistic heritage remains underrepresented in NLP, largely due to historical policies that favor foreign languages and create significant data inequities. In this paper, we integrate theoretical insights on Africa's language landscape with an empirical evaluation using Sahara - a comprehensive benchmark curated from large-scale, publicly accessible datasets capturing the continent's linguistic diversity. By systematically assessing the performance of leading large language models (LLMs) on Sahara, we demonstrate how policy-induced data variations directly impact model effectiveness across African languages. Our findings reveal that while a few languages perform reasonably well, many Indigenous languages remain marginalized due to sparse data. Leveraging these insights, we offer actionable recommendations for policy reforms and inclusive data practices. Overall, our work underscores the urgent need for a dual approach - combining theoretical understanding with empirical evaluation - to foster linguistic diversity in AI for African communities.

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Voice of a Continent: Mapping Africa's Speech Technology Frontier

cs.CL · 2025-05-24 · conditional · novelty 6.0

A new benchmark and fine-tuned Simba models improve speech recognition, synthesis, and language identification across 61 African languages, but the claimed state of the art lacks comparisons to prior task-specific systems.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Voice of a Continent: Mapping Africa's Speech Technology Frontier cs.CL · 2025-05-24 · conditional · none · ref 7 · internal anchor

    A new benchmark and fine-tuned Simba models improve speech recognition, synthesis, and language identification across 61 African languages, but the claimed state of the art lacks comparisons to prior task-specific systems.