Large-scale statistical analysis of four harmful language datasets reveals that interactions between annotator characteristics and linguistic cues drive annotation variation, with lexical features and attitudes prominent but patterns varying by dataset.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Pruning pretrained MoE models outperforms training from scratch under fixed budget, different expert compression methods converge after continued training, and progressive pruning plus multi-token KD improves the final 23A2B model.
Continual pre-training on a German medical corpus lets 7B models close much of the performance gap with 24B general models on medical benchmarks, though merging introduces some language mixing and verbosity.
citing papers explorer
-
Who and What? Using Linguistic Features and Annotator Characteristics to Analyze Annotation Variation
Large-scale statistical analysis of four harmful language datasets reveals that interactions between annotator characteristics and linguistic cues drive annotation variation, with lexical features and attitudes prominent but patterns varying by dataset.
-
SlimQwen: Exploring the Pruning and Distillation in Large MoE Model Pre-training
Pruning pretrained MoE models outperforms training from scratch under fixed budget, different expert compression methods converge after continued training, and progressive pruning plus multi-token KD improves the final 23A2B model.
-
Can Continual Pre-training Bridge the Performance Gap between General-purpose and Specialized Language Models in the Medical Domain?
Continual pre-training on a German medical corpus lets 7B models close much of the performance gap with 24B general models on medical benchmarks, though merging introduces some language mixing and verbosity.