Causality resolves trade-offs in trustworthy AI by treating them as invariance conflicts under different data-generating process changes.
Causality Is Key to Understand and Balance Multiple Goals in Trustworthy ML and Foundation Models
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Ensuring trustworthiness in machine learning (ML) systems is crucial as they become increasingly embedded in high-stakes domains. This paper advocates for integrating causal methods into machine learning to navigate the trade-offs among key principles of trustworthy ML, including fairness, privacy, robustness, accuracy, and explainability. While these objectives should ideally be satisfied simultaneously, they are often addressed in isolation, leading to conflicts and suboptimal solutions. Drawing on existing applications of causality in ML that successfully align goals such as fairness and accuracy or privacy and robustness, this paper argues that a causal approach is essential for balancing multiple competing objectives in both trustworthy ML and foundation models. Beyond highlighting these trade-offs, we examine how causality can be practically integrated into ML and foundation models, offering solutions to enhance their reliability and interpretability. Finally, we discuss the challenges, limitations, and opportunities in adopting causal frameworks, paving the way for more accountable and ethically sound AI systems.
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Causality is required for out-of-distribution generalization in AI, with a necessity theorem and unified causal estimators proposed to fix failure modes like hallucination and reward hacking.
citing papers explorer
-
Causality as the Statistical Conscience of Artificial Intelligence: From Pearl's Ladder to Trustworthy Machines
Causality is required for out-of-distribution generalization in AI, with a necessity theorem and unified causal estimators proposed to fix failure modes like hallucination and reward hacking.