Bell-type correlations are reinterpreted as sequential single-spin auto-correlations under counterfactual equivalence, explaining non-locality via state-altering measurements on undefined quantities.
What Bell Did
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
abstract
On the 50th anniversary of Bell's monumental 1964 paper, there is still widespread misunderstanding about exactly what Bell proved. This misunderstanding derives in turn from a failure to appreciate the earlier arguments of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen. I retrace the history and logical structure of these arguments in order to clarify the proper conclusion, namely that any world that displays violations of Bell's inequality for experiments done far from one another must be non-local. Since the world we happen to live in displays such violations, actual physics is non-local.
fields
quant-ph 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Bell's theorem: why probability factorisation fails
Bell-type correlations are reinterpreted as sequential single-spin auto-correlations under counterfactual equivalence, explaining non-locality via state-altering measurements on undefined quantities.