Q-methodology applied to ratings from 37 SE researchers on 50 statements about Rapid Reviews identifies four factors: undecided/needs-evidence, positive-but-standards-needed, skeptical/high-quality-focused, and pragmatic/context-dependent.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.SE 1years
2019 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Software Engineering Research Community Viewpoints on Rapid Reviews
Q-methodology applied to ratings from 37 SE researchers on 50 statements about Rapid Reviews identifies four factors: undecided/needs-evidence, positive-but-standards-needed, skeptical/high-quality-focused, and pragmatic/context-dependent.