LLM-based security code review is vulnerable to framing bias, with a novel iterative refinement attack achieving 100% success in reintroducing vulnerabilities across real projects.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 11 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
years
2026 2representative citing papers
PromptAudit evaluates five prompting strategies across five LLMs on 1000 CVEs and finds chain-of-thought prompting yields the strongest overall performance while adaptive chain-of-thought and self-consistency reduce effective results.
citing papers explorer
-
Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Review
LLM-based security code review is vulnerable to framing bias, with a novel iterative refinement attack achieving 100% success in reintroducing vulnerabilities across real projects.
-
PromptAudit: Auditing Prompt Sensitivity in LLM-Based Vulnerability Detection
PromptAudit evaluates five prompting strategies across five LLMs on 1000 CVEs and finds chain-of-thought prompting yields the strongest overall performance while adaptive chain-of-thought and self-consistency reduce effective results.