The paper asserts that solvable sliding-tile configurations number O(n^2) and that verifying solutions is polynomial-time, but the derivations contain fatal counting and algebraic errors.
Thermodynamic Perspectives on Computational Complexity: Exploring the P vs. NP Problem
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The resolution of the P vs. NP problem, a cornerstone in computational theory, remains elusive despite extensive exploration through mathematical logic and algorithmic theory. This paper takes a novel approach by integrating information theory, thermodynamics, and computational complexity, offering a comprehensive landscape of interdisciplinary study. We focus on entropy, a concept traditionally linked with uncertainty and disorder, and reinterpret it to assess the complexity of computational problems. Our research presents a structured framework for establishing entropy profiles within computational tasks, enabling a clear distinction between P and NP-classified problems. This framework quantifies the 'information cost' associated with these problem categories, highlighting their intrinsic computational complexity. We introduce Entropy-Driven Annealing (EDA) as a new method to decipher the energy landscapes of computational problems, focusing on the unique characteristics of NP problems. This method proposes a differential thermodynamic profile for NP problems in contrast to P problems and explores potential thermodynamic routes for finding polynomial-time solutions to NP challenges. Our introduction of EDA and its application to complex computational problems like the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) and protein-DNA complexes suggests a potential pathway toward unraveling the intricacies of the P vs. NP problem.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
math.GM 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The sliding tile puzzle, roots to polynomials, and $\textbf{P}$ vs. $\textbf{NP}$ complexity
The paper asserts that solvable sliding-tile configurations number O(n^2) and that verifying solutions is polynomial-time, but the derivations contain fatal counting and algebraic errors.