LLM safety evaluations for personal advice must test responses against diverse user vulnerability profiles, since context-blind ratings overestimate safety and realistic prompt context does not fix the problem.
Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, prolific, CloudResearch, qualtrics, and SONA
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
Hiding generative AI use to signal expertise reduces knowledge sharing and transparency among workplace colleagues.
citing papers explorer
-
Safe for Whom? Rethinking How We Evaluate the Safety of LLMs for Real Users
LLM safety evaluations for personal advice must test responses against diverse user vulnerability profiles, since context-blind ratings overestimate safety and realistic prompt context does not fix the problem.
-
"If You're Very Clever, No One Knows You've Used It": The Social Dynamics of Developing Generative AI Literacy in the Workplace
Hiding generative AI use to signal expertise reduces knowledge sharing and transparency among workplace colleagues.