The paper defines algorithmic contestability as identifying evidence to overturn potentially incorrect decisions and identifies three types of such evidence that make decisions normatively indefensible under the decision maker's standards.
Annual review of psychology , volume=
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
stat.ML 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Explainable AI Isn't Enough! Rethinking Algorithmic Contestability
The paper defines algorithmic contestability as identifying evidence to overturn potentially incorrect decisions and identifies three types of such evidence that make decisions normatively indefensible under the decision maker's standards.