AI disclosure lowers perceived article quality for both human and LLM raters, and only LLM raters show a demographic preference that disappears when AI assistance is disclosed.
Generative AI and Perceptual Harms: Who's Suspected of using LLMs?
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into a variety of writing tasks. While these tools can help people by generating ideas or producing higher quality work, like many other AI tools they may risk causing a variety of harms, disproportionately burdening historically marginalized groups. In this work, we introduce and evaluate perceptual harm, a term for the harm caused to users when others perceive or suspect them of using AI. We examined perceptual harms in three online experiments, each of which entailed human participants evaluating the profiles for fictional freelance writers. We asked participants whether they suspected the freelancers of using AI, the quality of their writing, and whether they should be hired. We found some support for perceptual harms against for certain demographic groups, but that perceptions of AI use negatively impacted writing evaluations and hiring outcomes across the board.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Penalizing Transparency? How AI Disclosure and Author Demographics Shape Human and AI Judgments About Writing
AI disclosure lowers perceived article quality for both human and LLM raters, and only LLM raters show a demographic preference that disappears when AI assistance is disclosed.