Merging public datasets and rejecting high-entropy predictions boosts reported melanoma detection accuracy to 97.8% and cuts misdiagnoses by over 40%, but lacks baseline comparisons and error bars.
Melanoma Detection with Uncertainty Quantification
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Early detection of melanoma is crucial for improving survival rates. Current detection tools often utilize data-driven machine learning methods but often overlook the full integration of multiple datasets. We combine publicly available datasets to enhance data diversity, allowing numerous experiments to train and evaluate various classifiers. We then calibrate them to minimize misdiagnoses by incorporating uncertainty quantification. Our experiments on benchmark datasets show accuracies of up to 93.2% before and 97.8% after applying uncertainty-based rejection, leading to a reduction in misdiagnoses by over 40.5%. Our code and data are publicly available, and a web-based interface for quick melanoma detection of user-supplied images is also provided.
fields
cs.CV 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Melanoma Detection with Uncertainty Quantification
Merging public datasets and rejecting high-entropy predictions boosts reported melanoma detection accuracy to 97.8% and cuts misdiagnoses by over 40%, but lacks baseline comparisons and error bars.