A survey arguing that calibration error is best understood as the degree to which two worlds, the predictor's and nature's, can be distinguished, and that this view unifies ECE, smooth calibration, CDL, and distance to calibration.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Calibration through the Lens of Indistinguishability
A survey arguing that calibration error is best understood as the degree to which two worlds, the predictor's and nature's, can be distinguished, and that this view unifies ECE, smooth calibration, CDL, and distance to calibration.