Reasoning tokens like 'Hmm' and 'Wait' mark steps where a model's internal state carries unusually high dependence with the correct answer, and suppressing them hurts accuracy.
NormXLogit: The Head-on-Top Never Lies
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
With new large language models (LLMs) emerging frequently, it is important to consider the potential value of model-agnostic approaches that can provide interpretability across a variety of architectures. While recent advances in LLM interpretability show promise, many rely on complex, model-specific methods with high computational costs. To address these limitations, we propose NormXLogit, a novel technique for assessing the significance of individual input tokens. This method operates based on the input and output representations associated with each token. First, we demonstrate that during the pre-training of LLMs, the norms of word embeddings effectively capture token importance. Second, we reveal a significant relationship between a token's importance and the extent to which its representation can resemble the model's final prediction. Extensive analyses reveal that our approach outperforms existing gradient-based methods in terms of faithfulness and offers competitive performance in layer-wise explanations compared to leading architecture-specific techniques.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Demystifying Reasoning Dynamics with Mutual Information: Thinking Tokens are Information Peaks in LLM Reasoning
Reasoning tokens like 'Hmm' and 'Wait' mark steps where a model's internal state carries unusually high dependence with the correct answer, and suppressing them hurts accuracy.