Two hand-annotated legal RAG benchmarks with low query-passage lexical overlap show that existing retrievers struggle, and that structured legal reasoning query expansion improves retrieval.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmark
Two hand-annotated legal RAG benchmarks with low query-passage lexical overlap show that existing retrievers struggle, and that structured legal reasoning query expansion improves retrieval.