A review arguing LLM-based quality scores could surpass bibliometrics in accuracy and coverage, but with unknown biases and gaming risks that currently block real-world use.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.DL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of Large Language Models: Advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effects
A review arguing LLM-based quality scores could surpass bibliometrics in accuracy and coverage, but with unknown biases and gaming risks that currently block real-world use.