Fine-tuning Whisper on Swiss German speech with subtitle supervision yields an honest 25.6% WER baseline (13.8% cWER) and demonstrates that prior SOTA claims of 17% WER result from benchmark contamination allowing 13.88% WER with no dialect training.
Standard-to-Dialect Transfer Trends Differ across Text and Speech: A Case Study on Intent and Topic Classification in German Dialects
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Research on cross-dialectal transfer from a standard to a non-standard dialect variety has typically focused on text data. However, dialects are primarily spoken, and non-standard spellings cause issues in text processing. We compare standard-to-dialect transfer in three settings: text models, speech models, and cascaded systems where speech first gets automatically transcribed and then further processed by a text model. We focus on German dialects in the context of written and spoken intent classification -- releasing the first dialectal audio intent classification dataset -- with supporting experiments on topic classification. The speech-only setup provides the best results on the dialect data while the text-only setup works best on the standard data. While the cascaded systems lag behind the text-only models for German, they perform relatively well on the dialectal data if the transcription system generates normalized, standard-like output.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Subtitle-Aligned Fine-Tuning of Whisper for Swiss German ASR: Benchmark Contamination, Convention Mismatch, and an Honest Baseline at 25.6% WER (13.8% cWER)
Fine-tuning Whisper on Swiss German speech with subtitle supervision yields an honest 25.6% WER baseline (13.8% cWER) and demonstrates that prior SOTA claims of 17% WER result from benchmark contamination allowing 13.88% WER with no dialect training.