A survey and untested proposal for a text-to-text transformer with domain-specific embeddings for cross-domain argument mining.
AMPERSAND: Argument Mining for PERSuAsive oNline Discussions
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Argumentation is a type of discourse where speakers try to persuade their audience about the reasonableness of a claim by presenting supportive arguments. Most work in argument mining has focused on modeling arguments in monologues. We propose a computational model for argument mining in online persuasive discussion forums that brings together the micro-level (argument as product) and macro-level (argument as process) models of argumentation. Fundamentally, this approach relies on identifying relations between components of arguments in a discussion thread. Our approach for relation prediction uses contextual information in terms of fine-tuning a pre-trained language model and leveraging discourse relations based on Rhetorical Structure Theory. We additionally propose a candidate selection method to automatically predict what parts of one's argument will be targeted by other participants in the discussion. Our models obtain significant improvements compared to recent state-of-the-art approaches using pointer networks and a pre-trained language model.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Unveiling Global Discourse Structures: Theoretical Analysis and NLP Applications in Argument Mining
A survey and untested proposal for a text-to-text transformer with domain-specific embeddings for cross-domain argument mining.