Pith. sign in

Distilling Opinions at Scale: Incremental Opinion Summarization using XL-OPSUMM

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Opinion summarization in e-commerce encapsulates the collective views of numerous users about a product based on their reviews. Typically, a product on an e-commerce platform has thousands of reviews, each review comprising around 10-15 words. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown proficiency in summarization tasks, they struggle to handle such a large volume of reviews due to context limitations. To mitigate, we propose a scalable framework called Xl-OpSumm that generates summaries incrementally. However, the existing test set, AMASUM has only 560 reviews per product on average. Due to the lack of a test set with thousands of reviews, we created a new test set called Xl-Flipkart by gathering data from the Flipkart website and generating summaries using GPT-4. Through various automatic evaluations and extensive analysis, we evaluated the framework's efficiency on two datasets, AMASUM and Xl-Flipkart. Experimental results show that our framework, Xl-OpSumm powered by Llama-3-8B-8k, achieves an average ROUGE-1 F1 gain of 4.38% and a ROUGE-L F1 gain of 3.70% over the next best-performing model.

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

LLMs as Architects and Critics for Multi-Source Opinion Summarization

cs.CL · 2025-07-07 · conditional · novelty 5.0

A new benchmark and prompt framework for generating and automatically evaluating product summaries that blend customer reviews with product metadata, with the best evaluator reaching 0.74 average Spearman correlation with human judgments.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • LLMs as Architects and Critics for Multi-Source Opinion Summarization cs.CL · 2025-07-07 · conditional · none · ref 38 · internal anchor

    A new benchmark and prompt framework for generating and automatically evaluating product summaries that blend customer reviews with product metadata, with the best evaluator reaching 0.74 average Spearman correlation with human judgments.