LLMs exhibit pseudo-deliberation, with consistent value-action misalignment in generated dialogues despite reasoning, as measured by the new VALDI framework across 4941 scenarios.
Are they lovers or friends? Evaluating LLMs' Social Reasoning in English and Korean Dialogues
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
As LLMs are increasingly deployed in real-world interactions, their social reasoning in interpersonal communication becomes critical. To explore their capabilities, we introduce SCRIPTS, a 1.1k-dialogue dataset in English and Korean, sourced from movie scripts and propose a social reasoning task based on SCRIPTS that evaluates the capacity of LLMs to infer the social relationships (e.g., friends, lovers) between speakers in each dialogue. Evaluating nine models on our task, current LLMs achieve around 75--80% on the English dataset and 58--69% in Korean, and models predict an Unlikely relationship in 10--25% of responses in both languages. Furthermore, we find that thinking models and chain-of-thought prompting provide minimal benefits for social reasoning and occasionally amplify social biases. In sum, there are significant limitations in current LLMs' social reasoning capabilities, especially for Korean, highlighting the need for efforts to develop socially-aware LLMs across languages.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Pseudo-Deliberation in Language Models: When Reasoning Fails to Align Values and Actions
LLMs exhibit pseudo-deliberation, with consistent value-action misalignment in generated dialogues despite reasoning, as measured by the new VALDI framework across 4941 scenarios.