An abstract recommends the moving phantoms rule for RetroPGF funding on welfare and strategyproofness grounds, but the provided body is an unrelated topology paper, making the analysis unverifiable.
Putting a Compass on the Map of Elections
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
abstract
Recently, Szufa et al. [AAMAS 2020] presented a "map of elections" that visualizes a set of 800 elections generated from various statistical cultures. While similar elections are grouped together on this map, there is no obvious interpretation of the elections' positions. We provide such an interpretation by introducing four canonical "extreme" elections, acting as a compass on the map. We use them to analyze both a dataset provided by Szufa et al. and a number of real-life elections. In effect, we find a new variant of the Mallows model and show that it captures real-life scenarios particularly well.
fields
cs.GT 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A Social Choice Analysis of Optimism's Retroactive Project Funding
An abstract recommends the moving phantoms rule for RetroPGF funding on welfare and strategyproofness grounds, but the provided body is an unrelated topology paper, making the analysis unverifiable.