Crossed random-effects models on LLM word ratings show 16.9% variance from genuine stimulus-specific individuality, exceeding null models and forming coherent per-model fingerprints.
Quantifying language models’ sensitivity to spurious features in prompt design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Machine individuality: Separating genuine idiosyncrasy from response bias in large language models
Crossed random-effects models on LLM word ratings show 16.9% variance from genuine stimulus-specific individuality, exceeding null models and forming coherent per-model fingerprints.