For every n≥2, the statement 'there is an n-entangled set of reals but no (n+1)-entangled set' is consistent with PID plus Martin's Axiom.
Martin’s axiom does not imply that every twoℵ1-dense sets of reals are isomorphic
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
math.LO 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
There may be an $n$-entangled set but no $n+1$-entangled sets
For every n≥2, the statement 'there is an n-entangled set of reals but no (n+1)-entangled set' is consistent with PID plus Martin's Axiom.