A regulated area-integral convergence criterion is claimed to prove RH, but the proof's key divergence estimate is contradicted by the paper's own excision of zero neighborhoods.
Beweis der Riemannschen Vermutung \"uber ein reguliertes normiertes Integralmodell
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We prove the Riemann Hypothesis via an analytically regulated surface integral over the critical strip of the Riemann zeta function. The key idea is that the convergence of this normalized integral is equivalent to the condition that all non-trivial zeros lie on the critical line. By constructing a singularity-sensitive integrand and removing infinitesimal disks around the poles, we isolate all divergence contributions analytically. The resulting integral model is independent of specific zero locations and provides a purely analytic criterion equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
math.GM 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
other 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Beweis der Riemannschen Vermutung \"uber ein reguliertes normiertes Integralmodell
A regulated area-integral convergence criterion is claimed to prove RH, but the proof's key divergence estimate is contradicted by the paper's own excision of zero neighborhoods.