A multi-layer uncertainty model finds that both transmission-layer and over-the-top exceptional-access architectures carry strictly higher modeled compromise risk than no-EA baselines, with risk distributions differing by architecture class under sparse evidence.
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security17(1), 1–20 (Aug 2014)
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.CR 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
A systematic comparison of eight Kubernetes hardening guidelines and ten scanners reveals substantial disparities in issue coverage and inconsistencies in scoring and ranking.
citing papers explorer
-
Quantifying Compromise Risk in Exceptional Access Architectures Under Sparse and Indirect Evidence
A multi-layer uncertainty model finds that both transmission-layer and over-the-top exceptional-access architectures carry strictly higher modeled compromise risk than no-EA baselines, with risk distributions differing by architecture class under sparse evidence.
-
A Comparison of Kubernetes Compliance Standards and Configuration Scanners
A systematic comparison of eight Kubernetes hardening guidelines and ten scanners reveals substantial disparities in issue coverage and inconsistencies in scoring and ranking.