Participatory design study with 17 practitioners yields a three-level trust-calibrated review workflow for LLM-generated multi-file code changes, validated positively by 43 practitioners in survey.
Do explicit review strategies improve code review performance? Towards understanding the role of cognitive load
3 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 12 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
12
external citations · Crossref
representative citing papers
Developers' questions during code review reveal a two-phase cognitive process, orientation then analysis, which the authors model as recognition-primed decision-making.
A nine-dimension risk framework for institutional DeFi adds three new dimensions to prior taxonomies and shows that five of twelve 2024-2026 incidents, including the two most systemic, require at least one of the new dimensions for full explanation.
citing papers explorer
-
Trust-Calibrated Code Review: A Participatory Design Study of Review Workflows for LLM-Generated Multi-File Changes
Participatory design study with 17 practitioners yields a three-level trust-calibrated review workflow for LLM-generated multi-file code changes, validated positively by 43 practitioners in survey.
-
Code Review as Decision-Making -- Building a Cognitive Model from the Questions Asked During Code Review
Developers' questions during code review reveal a two-phase cognitive process, orientation then analysis, which the authors model as recognition-primed decision-making.
-
Toward a Risk Assessment Framework for Institutional DeFi: A Nine-Dimension Approach
A nine-dimension risk framework for institutional DeFi adds three new dimensions to prior taxonomies and shows that five of twelve 2024-2026 incidents, including the two most systemic, require at least one of the new dimensions for full explanation.