Double-membership graphs of countable models of Anti-Foundation come in continuum-many isomorphism types, and their complete theories are classified by collections of consistency statements.
Undirecting membership in models of ZFA
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
It is known that, if we take a countable model of Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory ZFC and "undirect" the membership relation (that is, make a graph by joining $x$ to $y$ if either $x\in y$ or $y\in x$), we obtain the Erd\H{o}s--R\'enyi random graph. The crucial axiom in the proof of this is the Axiom of Foundation, so it is natural to wonder what happens if we delete this axiom, or replace it by an alternative (such as Aczel's Anti-Foundation Axiom). The resulting graph may fail to be simple, it may have loops (if $x\in x$ for some $x$) or multiple edges (if $x\in y$ and $y\in x$ for some $x,y$). We show that, in ZFA, if we keep the loops and ignore the multiple edges, we obtain the "random loopy graph" (which is $\aleph_0$-categorical and homogeneous), but if we keep multiple edges, the resulting graph is not $\aleph_0$-categorical, but has infinitely many $1$-types. Moreover, if we keep only loops and double edges and discard single edges, the resulting graph contains countably many connected components isomorphic to any given finite connected graph with loops.
fields
math.LO 1years
2019 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
On double-membership graphs of models of Anti-Foundation
Double-membership graphs of countable models of Anti-Foundation come in continuum-many isomorphism types, and their complete theories are classified by collections of consistency statements.