Real-robot trials with OpenVLA on a UR5e arm show consistent offline-to-closed-loop gaps driven by action semantics, coordinate conventions, temporal alignment, image preprocessing, and dataset quality rather than model capacity.
Gaze-Regularized Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulation
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Despite advances in Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, robotic manipulation struggles with fine-grained tasks because current models lack mechanisms for active visual attention allocation. Human gaze naturally encodes intent, planning, and execution patterns -- offering a powerful supervisory signal for guiding robot perception. We introduce a gaze-regularized training framework that aligns VLA models' internal attention with human visual patterns without architectural modifications or inference-time overhead. Our method transforms temporally aggregated gaze heatmaps into patch-level distributions and regularizes the transformer's attention through KL divergence, creating an inductive bias toward task-relevant features while preserving deployment efficiency. When integrated into existing VLA architectures, our approach yields 4-12% improvements across manipulation benchmarks. The gaze-regularized models reach equivalent performance with fewer training steps and maintain robustness under lighting variations and sensor noise. Beyond performance metrics, the learned attention patterns produce interpretable visualizations that mirror human strategies, enhancing trust in robotic systems. Moreover, our framework requires no eye-tracking equipment and applies directly to existing datasets. These results demonstrate that human perceptual priors can significantly accelerate robot learning while improving both task performance and system interpretability.
fields
cs.RO 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Vision-Language-Action Models: Experimental Insights from a Real-World UR5 Platform
Real-robot trials with OpenVLA on a UR5e arm show consistent offline-to-closed-loop gaps driven by action semantics, coordinate conventions, temporal alignment, image preprocessing, and dataset quality rather than model capacity.