Presents TRUST-Bench benchmark for hidden-trigger tool compromises in LLM agents and VISTA-Guard framework for trajectory-aware risk scoring of final actions under untrusted feedback.
Evaluating Privilege Usage of Agents with Real-World Tools
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
abstract
Equipping LLM agents with real-world tools can substantially improve productivity. However, granting agents autonomy over tool use also transfers the associated privileges to both the agent and the underlying LLM. Improper privilege usage may lead to serious consequences, including information leakage and infrastructure damage. While several benchmarks have been built to study agents' security, they often rely on pre-coded tools and restricted interaction patterns. Such crafted environments differ substantially from the real-world, making it hard to assess agents' security capabilities in critical privilege control and usage. Therefore, we propose GrantBox, a security evaluation sandbox for analyzing agent privilege usage. GrantBox automatically integrates real-world tools and allows LLM agents to invoke genuine privileges, enabling the evaluation of privilege usage under prompt injection attacks. Our results indicate that while LLMs exhibit basic security awareness and can block some direct attacks, they remain vulnerable to more sophisticated attacks, resulting in an average attack success rate of 84.80% in carefully crafted scenarios.
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CR 4years
2026 4roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Coding agents struggle to infer least-privilege file permissions by omitting needed accesses while granting unused or sensitive ones, but Sufficiency-Tightness Decomposition improves sensitive-task success by up to 15.8% and reduces attacks.
Stage-level tracking of prompt injection reveals that write-node placement and model-specific behaviors determine attack outcomes more than initial exposure in LLM pipelines.
A TEE-backed architecture isolates security-critical decisions in self-hosted AI agents to prevent host-level abuse from malicious inputs while maintaining allowed functionality.
citing papers explorer
-
Trust No Tool: Evaluating and Defending LLM Agents under Untrusted Tool Feedback
Presents TRUST-Bench benchmark for hidden-trigger tool compromises in LLM agents and VISTA-Guard framework for trajectory-aware risk scoring of final actions under untrusted feedback.
-
Do Coding Agents Understand Least-Privilege Authorization?
Coding agents struggle to infer least-privilege file permissions by omitting needed accesses while granting unused or sensitive ones, but Sufficiency-Tightness Decomposition improves sensitive-task success by up to 15.8% and reduces attacks.
-
Kill-Chain Canaries: Stage-Level Tracking of Prompt Injection Across Attack Surfaces and Model Safety Tiers
Stage-level tracking of prompt injection reveals that write-node placement and model-specific behaviors determine attack outcomes more than initial exposure in LLM pipelines.
-
Constraining Host-Level Abuse in Self-Hosted Computer-Use Agents via TEE-Backed Isolation
A TEE-backed architecture isolates security-critical decisions in self-hosted AI agents to prevent host-level abuse from malicious inputs while maintaining allowed functionality.