LLMs generate adequate counterspeech for co-occurring hate and misinformation in 40% of cases, with a mixed knowledge strategy from fact-checkers and NGOs proving most effective after expert revision.
PloS one , volume=
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.CL 4years
2026 4representative citing papers
A proposed pipeline shows LLMs introduce detectable race and gender biases when summarizing life narratives, creating potential for representational harm in research.
Annotation disagreement on toxic language can be moderately predicted from textual features, with high-opposition items proving harder for models to estimate accurately.
Socio-Contrastive Learning jointly learns socio-demographic representations and textual features via contrastive objectives to predict annotator perspectives more accurately than concatenation baselines.
citing papers explorer
-
Assisted Counterspeech Writing at the Crossroads of Hate Speech and Misinformation
LLMs generate adequate counterspeech for co-occurring hate and misinformation in 40% of cases, with a mixed knowledge strategy from fact-checkers and NGOs proving most effective after expert revision.
-
Whose Story Gets Told? Positionality and Bias in LLM Summaries of Life Narratives
A proposed pipeline shows LLMs introduce detectable race and gender biases when summarizing life narratives, creating potential for representational harm in research.
-
Quantifying and Predicting Disagreement in Graded Human Ratings
Annotation disagreement on toxic language can be moderately predicted from textual features, with high-opposition items proving harder for models to estimate accurately.
-
Modeling Human Perspectives with Socio-Demographic Representations
Socio-Contrastive Learning jointly learns socio-demographic representations and textual features via contrastive objectives to predict annotator perspectives more accurately than concatenation baselines.