For 3D cubic lattices, the paper claims first-order finite-size signatures of explosive percolation for k≥2 and monotone rigidification efficiency with k, but the proof of the central theorem is arithmetically impossible and the abstract's simulations (L=192) never appear in the body.
Double-network-inspired mechanical metamaterials
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Mechanical metamaterials are renowned for their ability to achieve high stiffness and strength at low densities, often at the expense of low ductility and stretchability-a persistent trade-off in materials. In contrast, materials such as double-network hydrogels feature interpenetrating compliant and stiff polymer networks, and exhibit unprecedented combinations of high stiffness and stretchability, resulting in exceptional toughness. Here, we present double-network-inspired (DNI) metamaterials by integrating monolithic truss (stiff) and woven (compliant) components into a metamaterial architecture, which achieve a tenfold increase in stiffness and stretchability compared to their pure woven and truss counterparts, respectively. Nonlinear computational mechanics models elucidate that enhanced energy dissipation in these DNI metamaterials stems from increased frictional dissipation due to entanglements between the two networks. Through introduction of internal defects, which typically degrade mechanical properties, we demonstrate an opposite effect of a threefold increase in energy dissipation for these metamaterials via failure delocalization. This work opens avenues for developing new classes of metamaterials in a high-compliance regime inspired by polymer network topologies.
fields
cond-mat.stat-mech 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Explosive connectivity and mechanical rigidity in cubic lattice structures
For 3D cubic lattices, the paper claims first-order finite-size signatures of explosive percolation for k≥2 and monotone rigidification efficiency with k, but the proof of the central theorem is arithmetically impossible and the abstract's simulations (L=192) never appear in the body.