D-GPTScore, which averages GPT-4o's per-aspect ratings of concept-customized images, correlates with human preference at 0.78 Pearson on the new CC-AlignBench, beating prior metrics.
A Unified Agentic Framework for Evaluating Conditional Image Generation
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Conditional image generation has gained significant attention for its ability to personalize content. However, the field faces challenges in developing task-agnostic, reliable, and explainable evaluation metrics. This paper introduces CIGEval, a unified agentic framework for comprehensive evaluation of conditional image generation tasks. CIGEval utilizes large multimodal models (LMMs) as its core, integrating a multi-functional toolbox and establishing a fine-grained evaluation framework. Additionally, we synthesize evaluation trajectories for fine-tuning, empowering smaller LMMs to autonomously select appropriate tools and conduct nuanced analyses based on tool outputs. Experiments across seven prominent conditional image generation tasks demonstrate that CIGEval (GPT-4o version) achieves a high correlation of 0.4625 with human assessments, closely matching the inter-annotator correlation of 0.47. Moreover, when implemented with 7B open-source LMMs using only 2.3K training trajectories, CIGEval surpasses the previous GPT-4o-based state-of-the-art method. Case studies on GPT-4o image generation highlight CIGEval's capability in identifying subtle issues related to subject consistency and adherence to control guidance, indicating its great potential for automating evaluation of image generation tasks with human-level reliability.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CV 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Human Preference-Aligned Concept Customization Benchmark via Decomposed Evaluation
D-GPTScore, which averages GPT-4o's per-aspect ratings of concept-customized images, correlates with human preference at 0.78 Pearson on the new CC-AlignBench, beating prior metrics.