A scoping review and 50-clinician survey find that MedVQA research is poorly aligned with radiology practice, with mostly non-diagnostic questions, missing patient context, and evaluation metrics that do not measure clinical utility.
Multiple Meta-model Quantifying for Medical Visual Question Answering
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Transfer learning is an important step to extract meaningful features and overcome the data limitation in the medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) task. However, most of the existing medical VQA methods rely on external data for transfer learning, while the meta-data within the dataset is not fully utilized. In this paper, we present a new multiple meta-model quantifying method that effectively learns meta-annotation and leverages meaningful features to the medical VQA task. Our proposed method is designed to increase meta-data by auto-annotation, deal with noisy labels, and output meta-models which provide robust features for medical VQA tasks. Extensively experimental results on two public medical VQA datasets show that our approach achieves superior accuracy in comparison with other state-of-the-art methods, while does not require external data to train meta-models.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Barriers in Integrating Medical Visual Question Answering into Radiology Workflows: A Scoping Review and Clinicians' Insights
A scoping review and 50-clinician survey find that MedVQA research is poorly aligned with radiology practice, with mostly non-diagnostic questions, missing patient context, and evaluation metrics that do not measure clinical utility.