Pith. sign in

Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanations

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Counterfactual explanations are one of the most popular methods to make predictions of black box machine learning models interpretable by providing explanations in the form of `what-if scenarios'. Most current approaches optimize a collapsed, weighted sum of multiple objectives, which are naturally difficult to balance a-priori. We propose the Multi-Objective Counterfactuals (MOC) method, which translates the counterfactual search into a multi-objective optimization problem. Our approach not only returns a diverse set of counterfactuals with different trade-offs between the proposed objectives, but also maintains diversity in feature space. This enables a more detailed post-hoc analysis to facilitate better understanding and also more options for actionable user responses to change the predicted outcome. Our approach is also model-agnostic and works for numerical and categorical input features. We show the usefulness of MOC in concrete cases and compare our approach with state-of-the-art methods for counterfactual explanations.

citation-role summary

other 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

other 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • An Explainable Gaussian Process Auto-encoder for Tabular Data cs.LG · 2025-08-31 · conditional · none · ref 8 · internal anchor

    A Gaussian-process autoencoder with a latent-space density estimator generates counterfactual examples for tabular data, with competitive or better scores on several evaluation metrics.