A new toolkit with cards and maps enables AI designers to juxtapose values and harms in early concept stages, shown valuable in designer surveys and interviews.
Design Issues 8, 2 (1992), 5 –21
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 2
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 3years
2026 3roles
background 2polarities
background 2representative citing papers
Designers using generative AI for concept envisioning engage in reciprocal reflection-in-action that surfaces multi-level value tensions and prioritizes harm recognition over positive value articulation.
Navigating AI-generated 3D environments from non-human traces supports reflection-in-action in more-than-human design, with designers oscillating between treating outputs as generative provocations and authoritative representations.
citing papers explorer
-
Developing an AI Concept Envisioning Toolkit to Support Reflective Juxtaposition of Values and Harms
A new toolkit with cards and maps enables AI designers to juxtapose values and harms in early concept stages, shown valuable in designer surveys and interviews.
-
How Designers Envision Value-Oriented AI Design Concepts with Generative AI
Designers using generative AI for concept envisioning engage in reciprocal reflection-in-action that surfaces multi-level value tensions and prioritizes harm recognition over positive value articulation.
-
AI-Generated 3D Environments as Speculative Mediators in More-Than-Human Design: An Exploratory Study
Navigating AI-generated 3D environments from non-human traces supports reflection-in-action in more-than-human design, with designers oscillating between treating outputs as generative provocations and authoritative representations.