No new empirical result; the paper reviews known AI security risks and argues that AI-driven defenses plus targeted regulation are both necessary.
Coarse-Tuning Models of Code with Reinforcement Learning Feedback
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on code have recently emerged as the dominant approach to program synthesis. However, these models are trained using next-token prediction, which ignores the syntax and semantics of code. We propose RLCF, that further trains a pre-trained LLM via reinforcement learning, using feedback from a grounding function that scores the quality of the code. The grounding function uses (i) compiler-derived feedback on whether the code it generates passes a set of correctness checks; and (ii) feedback from a different LLM that compares the generated code to a reference code. RLCF is model- and language-agnostic. We empirically evaluate it on the MBJP and MathQA tasks for Java. Our experiments show that RLCF raises the odds that an LLM-generated program compiles, is executable, and produces the right output on tests, often allowing LLMs to match the performance of 2x-8x larger LLMs.
fields
cs.CR 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Cyber Shadows: Neutralizing Security Threats with AI and Targeted Policy Measures
No new empirical result; the paper reviews known AI security risks and argues that AI-driven defenses plus targeted regulation are both necessary.