Pith. sign in

arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07673 , year=

5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

5 Pith papers citing it

years

2026 5

representative citing papers

You Don't Need to Run Every Eval

cs.LG · 2026-06-22 · conditional · novelty 6.0

The benchmark score matrix of 84 models on 133 tasks is approximately rank-2; BenchPress recovers held-out scores to within 4.6 points and identifies 5-benchmark subsets that predict the full scorecard to within 3.93-4.55 points.

Validity Threats for Foundation Model Research

cs.LG · 2026-06-03 · accept · novelty 6.0

Maps common low-compute research strategies for foundation models onto statistical, internal, external, and construct validity threats via a causal-inference lens.

citing papers explorer

Showing 5 of 5 citing papers.

  • FLIPS: Instance-Fingerprinting for LLMs via Pseudo-random Sequences cs.LG · 2026-06-02 · unverdicted · none · ref 60 · internal anchor

    FLIPS identifies LLM instances with 96% closed-set and 90% open-set accuracy by exploiting biases in generated binary random sequences across 237 instances.

  • You Don't Need to Run Every Eval cs.LG · 2026-06-22 · conditional · none · ref 6 · internal anchor

    The benchmark score matrix of 84 models on 133 tasks is approximately rank-2; BenchPress recovers held-out scores to within 4.6 points and identifies 5-benchmark subsets that predict the full scorecard to within 3.93-4.55 points.

  • Validity Threats for Foundation Model Research cs.LG · 2026-06-03 · accept · none · ref 110 · internal anchor

    Maps common low-compute research strategies for foundation models onto statistical, internal, external, and construct validity threats via a causal-inference lens.

  • Towards Reliable LLM Evaluation: Correcting the Winner's Curse in Adaptive Benchmarking stat.ML · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · none · ref 32 · internal anchor

    SIREN corrects winner's curse bias in adaptive LLM benchmarking via selection-aware repeated splits and bootstrap for valid procedure-level confidence intervals.

  • Efficient Evaluation of LLM Performance with Statistical Guarantees stat.ML · 2026-01-28 · unverdicted · none · ref 17 · internal anchor

    Factorized Active Querying (FAQ) provides up to 5 times more effective samples for LLM accuracy estimation by using Bayesian factor models and adaptive querying under a fixed budget with guaranteed coverage.