More comprehensible explainability visualizations increase perceived model bias and decrease trust, with bias perception mediating the negative comprehension-trust relationship.
Show or Suppress? Managing Input Uncertainty in Machine Learning Model Explanations
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Feature attribution is widely used in interpretable machine learning to explain how influential each measured input feature value is for an output inference. However, measurements can be uncertain, and it is unclear how the awareness of input uncertainty can affect the trust in explanations. We propose and study two approaches to help users to manage their perception of uncertainty in a model explanation: 1) transparently show uncertainty in feature attributions to allow users to reflect on, and 2) suppress attribution to features with uncertain measurements and shift attribution to other features by regularizing with an uncertainty penalty. Through simulation experiments, qualitative interviews, and quantitative user evaluations, we identified the benefits of moderately suppressing attribution uncertainty, and concerns regarding showing attribution uncertainty. This work adds to the understanding of handling and communicating uncertainty for model interpretability.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Your Model Is Unfair, Are You Even Aware? Inverse Relationship Between Comprehension and Trust in Explainability Visualizations of Biased ML Models
More comprehensible explainability visualizations increase perceived model bias and decrease trust, with bias perception mediating the negative comprehension-trust relationship.