A position paper making the case that specialised, well-specified AI systems are more robust, secure, and governable than general-purpose AGI systems, and that hard-to-specify tasks need specified governance.
Solidago: A Modular Collaborative Scoring Pipeline
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This paper presents Solidago, an end-to-end modular pipeline to allow any community of users to collaboratively score any number of entities. Solidago proposes a six-module decomposition. First, it uses pretrust and peer-to-peer vouches to assign trust scores to users. Second, based on participation, trust scores are turned into voting rights per user per entity. Third, for each user, a preference model is learned from the user's evaluation data. Fourth, users' models are put on a similar scale. Fifth, these models are securely aggregated. Sixth, models are post-processed to yield human-readable global scores. We also propose default implementations of the six modules, including a novel trust propagation algorithm, and adaptations of state-of-the-art scaling and aggregation solutions. Our pipeline has been successfully deployed on the open-source platform tournesol.app. We thereby lay an appealing foundation for the collaborative, effective, scalable, fair, interpretable and secure scoring of any set of entities.
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A Case for Specialisation in Non-Human Entities
A position paper making the case that specialised, well-specified AI systems are more robust, secure, and governable than general-purpose AGI systems, and that hard-to-specify tasks need specified governance.