LLMs identify autism-related words but frequently misclassify nuanced ableism, over-flagging intra-community language and under-flagging harmful stereotypes.
RIDE: Enhancing Large Language Model Alignment through Restyled In-Context Learning Demonstration Exemplars
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Alignment tuning is crucial for ensuring large language models (LLMs) behave ethically and helpfully. Current alignment approaches require high-quality annotations and significant training resources. This paper proposes a low-cost, tuning-free method using in-context learning (ICL) to enhance LLM alignment. Through an analysis of high-quality ICL demos, we identified style as a key factor influencing LLM alignment capabilities and explicitly restyled ICL exemplars based on this stylistic framework. Additionally, we combined the restyled demos to achieve a balance between the two conflicting aspects of LLM alignment--factuality and safety. We packaged the restyled examples as prompts to trigger few-shot learning, improving LLM alignment. Compared to the best baseline approach, with an average score of 5.00 as the maximum, our method achieves a maximum 0.10 increase on the Alpaca task (from 4.50 to 4.60), a 0.22 enhancement on the Just-eval benchmark (from 4.34 to 4.56), and a maximum improvement of 0.32 (from 3.53 to 3.85) on the MT-Bench dataset. We release the code and data at https://github.com/AnonymousCode-ComputerScience/RIDE.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Beyond Keywords: Evaluating Large Language Model Classification of Nuanced Ableism
LLMs identify autism-related words but frequently misclassify nuanced ableism, over-flagging intra-community language and under-flagging harmful stereotypes.