pith. sign in

arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.05698 , year=

3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

3 Pith papers citing it
abstract

We study the problem of generating source code in a strongly typed, Java-like programming language, given a label (for example a set of API calls or types) carrying a small amount of information about the code that is desired. The generated programs are expected to respect a "realistic" relationship between programs and labels, as exemplified by a corpus of labeled programs available during training. Two challenges in such conditional program generation are that the generated programs must satisfy a rich set of syntactic and semantic constraints, and that source code contains many low-level features that impede learning. We address these problems by training a neural generator not on code but on program sketches, or models of program syntax that abstract out names and operations that do not generalize across programs. During generation, we infer a posterior distribution over sketches, then concretize samples from this distribution into type-safe programs using combinatorial techniques. We implement our ideas in a system for generating API-heavy Java code, and show that it can often predict the entire body of a method given just a few API calls or data types that appear in the method.

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 3

representative citing papers

Gradient-Based Program Synthesis with Neurally Interpreted Languages

cs.LG · 2026-04-20 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

NLI autonomously discovers a vocabulary of primitive operations and interprets variable-length programs via a neural executor, allowing end-to-end training and gradient-based test-time adaptation that outperforms prior methods on combinatorial generalization tasks.

Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode

cs.PL · 2022-02-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

AlphaCode generates novel code solutions for competitive programming problems and achieves an average top 54.3% ranking in Codeforces contests with over 5,000 participants.

citing papers explorer

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.