Introduces hybrid noise and novel coupling analysis to achieve the first convergent hidden-state DP bound for zeroth-order optimization.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10530 (2019)
9 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
representative citing papers
The α-Wasserstein mechanism calibrates noise for exact Rényi Pufferfish Privacy by bounding the Wasserstein metric, generalizing the W_∞ pufferfish mechanism and Rényi differential privacy results.
DPQuant uses epoch-wise probabilistic layer rotation and DP loss sensitivity to quantize only a changing subset of layers, reducing accuracy degradation from quantization noise in DP-SGD and delivering up to 2.21x throughput gains with under 2% accuracy drop.
DP-SelFT improves the privacy-utility trade-off for LLM fine-tuning by selecting robust layer subsets via DP synthetic data and perturbation-matched evaluation.
DP-SGD with expected or batch averaging (EASGM or ASGM) has weaker privacy guarantees than the standard subsampled Gaussian mechanism analysis, confirmed by theoretical re-analysis and audits of libraries including Opacus.
INO-SGD down-weights data in each batch to improve model performance on strongly private data while satisfying individualized differential privacy constraints.
Shuffled DP-SGD requires σ ≥ 1/√(2 ln M) or κ ≥ (1/√8)(1 - 1/√(4π ln M)) to limit adversarial advantage, preventing strong privacy and high utility simultaneously.
Post-processing via random selection or linear combination of differentially private models allows meeting arbitrary target privacy parameters without additional training.
citing papers explorer
-
Privacy Amplification in Differentially Private Zeroth-Order Optimization with Hidden States
Introduces hybrid noise and novel coupling analysis to achieve the first convergent hidden-state DP bound for zeroth-order optimization.
-
$\alpha$-Wasserstein Mechanism for R\'{e}nyi Pufferfish Privacy
The α-Wasserstein mechanism calibrates noise for exact Rényi Pufferfish Privacy by bounding the Wasserstein metric, generalizing the W_∞ pufferfish mechanism and Rényi differential privacy results.
-
DPQuant: Efficient and Differentially-Private Model Training via Dynamic Quantization Scheduling
DPQuant uses epoch-wise probabilistic layer rotation and DP loss sensitivity to quantize only a changing subset of layers, reducing accuracy degradation from quantization noise in DP-SGD and delivering up to 2.21x throughput gains with under 2% accuracy drop.
-
DP-SelFT: Differentially Private Selective Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models
DP-SelFT improves the privacy-utility trade-off for LLM fine-tuning by selecting robust layer subsets via DP synthetic data and perturbation-matched evaluation.
-
Rethinking the Security of DP-SGD: A Corrected Analysis of Differentially Private Machine Learning
DP-SGD with expected or batch averaging (EASGM or ASGM) has weaker privacy guarantees than the standard subsampled Gaussian mechanism analysis, confirmed by theoretical re-analysis and audits of libraries including Opacus.
-
INO-SGD: Addressing Utility Imbalance under Individualized Differential Privacy
INO-SGD down-weights data in each batch to improve model performance on strongly private data while satisfying individualized differential privacy constraints.
-
Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGD
Shuffled DP-SGD requires σ ≥ 1/√(2 ln M) or κ ≥ (1/√8)(1 - 1/√(4π ln M)) to limit adversarial advantage, preventing strong privacy and high utility simultaneously.
-
Differentially Private Model Merging
Post-processing via random selection or linear combination of differentially private models allows meeting arbitrary target privacy parameters without additional training.
- Trade-off Functions for DP-SGD with Subsampling based on Random Shuffling: Tight Upper and Lower Bounds