A systematic review of 141 papers derives a three-axis taxonomy of multi-agent debate design (participants, interaction, agreement) and shows the field has converged on a narrow default pattern.
Vincent, Saab Mansour, et al
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.SE 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Multi-Agent Debate Strategies: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges
A systematic review of 141 papers derives a three-axis taxonomy of multi-agent debate design (participants, interaction, agreement) and shows the field has converged on a narrow default pattern.