Survey of 56 authors at two CS venues finds 84% viewed AI reviews as useful and 82% used some feedback in revisions, yet trusted them less than human reviews and preferred supervised deployment.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CY 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
To Trust or Not to Trust: Authors' Response to AI-based Reviews
Survey of 56 authors at two CS venues finds 84% viewed AI reviews as useful and 82% used some feedback in revisions, yet trusted them less than human reviews and preferred supervised deployment.