Non-English papers face substantially higher rates of negative peer review bias than English-only papers in NLP, with demanding unjustified cross-lingual generalization as the dominant form.
• Formultilingual-count-only: Use the stated count (e.g., 101) even thoughlanguagesis empty
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Are Non-English Papers Reviewed Fairly? Language-of-Study Bias in NLP Peer Reviews
Non-English papers face substantially higher rates of negative peer review bias than English-only papers in NLP, with demanding unjustified cross-lingual generalization as the dominant form.